1.
「港鈿要博」 |
2014-06-18 08:54 |
|
「地大勿博」「港鈿要博」??? 投資價值在有能力的購樓者的心中,在香港最近有贏開再贏的購樓者:博士購酒店,賭王太太購商廈,玄之又玄之師購商舖,…… 前怕狼,後怕虎者將一事無成……終生無法作出一個決定……
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
打工仔 Andy |
|
2014-06-18 09:52 |
|
我覺得這個租客是怕你地會加租, 所以先下手為強的態度!現在找呢 d 報十分方面就手, 街上日日有得攞!其實這個租客都是想繼租! 不過態度好重要!我也試過,都無加租個租客扭扭擰擰又唔回覆! 結果, 我直接出一封" 終止租約通知書" 比佢!立即收到租客電話!哈哈...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
通脹危機若隱若現 今天,聯儲局將會舉行連續兩日的議息會議。今天公布的5月份物價"出乎意料之外" (不是我出乎之料之外,只是主流媒體出乎意料之外)上升0.4%,高過市場預期足足一倍(只有楊某預期的一半)。過去一年,消費物價上升2.1%,超越了聯儲局加息門檻。更加要命的事情是,4月份美國消費開支下跌0.1%。密芝根大學消費者信心指數由4月的84.1下跌至5月的81.9。看來,通脹升溫已經打擊美國人的消費意欲,情況不妙。 茶黨成功奪權,剛好踫上消費物價急升,如果聯儲局坐視不理,極可能遭到茶黨政治報復。聯儲局官員如果要堅持超低利率,一定要做好最壞準備。 相信,聯儲局會提早加息。哈哈,香港隨時爆樓災啦,樓價跌跌跌,香港炒家好快要去住劏房啦,天理循環,報應不爽。可能劏博士要去街市劏魚........俾佢狠到啦,想點劏都得。
|
|
8.
中女社社長 |
2014-06-18 10:15 |
|
可以跟你談即係佢地都知行情. 租金由租客來訂, 一定會訂一個遠離現實的價錢. 我會直接一點, 談不上就拉倒! 叫佢搵搬運公司, 裝修公司, 經紀公司找新寫字樓. 呢D都係租客成本
|
|
9.
今日阿爺發功 |
2014-06-18 10:22 |
|
|
10.
好文share |
2014-06-18 10:34 |
|
| 自筆者認識香港樓市以來,政府的遏抑措施沒有比去年更厲害。但據某地產代理公司的樓價指數,去年本地樓價攀升百分之二點七;差餉物業估價署公布的數字是百分之九;近日國際貨幣基金組織更指出,去年香港樓價的升幅位列全球第二,超過百分之十。 上述三個數字哪個可信?我認為應以差餉物業估價署最值得信賴,因為地產代理公司的指數按周調整,雖較能反映市場脈搏,但這類指數必須有大額成交才能顯示實況,去年成交太少,因而反映在指數上也只會升幅輕微。國際貨幣基金組織則財雄勢大,據說他們早已成為不少落後國家的後台老闆,該會網絡非同小可,對香港經濟資訊的掌握自然並非一般物業代理公司可比,他們說本地樓價攀升了百分之十,資料當然會比百分之二點七的可信。 但最可信的,還是差餉物業估價署的數據,因為他們掌握了全港每一處物業的成交價格,而該署的數字也跟國際貨幣基金組織十分接近,至此我們幾可肯定,去年全港樓價的升幅應是百分之九,香港別的事情不易一錘定音,惟有在這事上應該可以。 人們總認為香港樓市應該下跌,但不代表便真會下跌,前者是理想,後者是現實,理想與現實從來都是相違者多,一致者少。從理想上,筆者固然希望樓市可以盡快下調,讓我可以從容地換間更大的房子。但現實上對樓價的預測則是相反的,我既然渴望低價入市,就代表對住房仍有強大需求,而舉目全港,跟我有相同意願的人所在多有,市場上蓄積着如此強大的購買力,價格又如何能下調?待有朝一日,人們認為即使樓價跌了下來,我還是沒興趣入市,那時的跌浪才是真的。 |
|
|
|
甘業主唔肯減租反要加租(息口唔加唔再買美債)甘係咪即係樓價最後都係跌呢?
|
|
|
我租客傾續租, 又話經濟差, 又話水喉...., 結果減租10%
|
|
13.
to 8/f |
2014-06-18 11:26 |
|
|
14.
Alan Pepper |
|
2014-06-18 11:42 |
|
I think it really depends on the property la. If residential and offices if rental reasonable no one would want to leave their current premise. But nowadays the retail markets are very poor, the escalated prices from 2009 to 2013 has to stabilize or be reduced depending on the location. Because a retailer would not pay the rental if cannot make any money. Unless it is at a really prominent location where there is a flagship store value that's another story. But most second line shops cannot generate that value and surely cannot generate the turnover. This is the reason we see a lot of vacant shops in cwb, Central and TST. Of course it will never adjust back to 2007 but surely will reduced to say 2010-2011.
|
|
15.
Alan Pepper |
|
2014-06-18 11:57 |
|
To 12/F
Sometimes reduce 10% or increase 10% for office space is ok la, because I am on both sides I may give you some insight. When I rent property if the landlord is really good (believe me I have seen a few) sometimes they overcharge 10%, sometimes they let me have the advantage. All these years it evens out. As a Landlord, I do the same. A good tenant is a long term and no hassle tenant. They pay on time, give me no trouble, so 10% less than market or maybe no increase in rental sometimes is acceptable la. Long term and good Landlord / Tenant is good for business.
Some landlords have increased my rental 3 times since 2005, but I still rent because it is the market rental and if I can sustain and make money I will pay. But some neighbours rental are asking 6x the rental from 2005... but you see they only have 2 year contracts and usually vacant for 1 or even 3 years. Works out the same la.... Those Landlords are a little crazy I think... Because say I am pay $50, every year and pay on time, its better than rental $100 buy rent 1/2 year and tenant always leave 1 contract only... and trouble in renegotiation etc...
|
|
16.
Alan Pepper |
|
2014-06-18 12:02 |
|
To 10/F
Yes, good article. He is 面對現實
|
|
17.
To:13/f |
2014-06-18 12:09 |
|
人地有樓去吉, 你有冇呀! 唔駛祝人地喎, 人地駛鬼你去祝咩, 你d咁既口.
|
|
18.
Small Potato |
2014-06-18 12:30 |
|
我有些朋友幾年前將唯一的自住樓賣左等跌後入市,一等就4-5 年,其中一對夫婦2009 賣出,賺了50多萬,但都未夠交這幾年嘅租金, 舊年仲生埋個仔!等了又等,最終最近以6 百幾萭買了鯇魚海灣6百幾尺-3/F!
如來當年吾炒跌,自住嘅煙花海景樓升左40-50%,供樓又軽鬆,都吾駛退而求其次買呢個奇則及面壁低層嘅樓,個廳又細露台又吾實際,唉!鄧佢吾抵! 所以,湯博士成日提大家咪賣走自住樓係好真!
|
|
|
博士真是好老闆,那位同事必定是獲益良多。 她是很上心,才會又喊又笑。
|
|
20.
to 17/f |
2014-06-18 12:58 |
|
|